Colorado Employee Advocates | CEA

Schedule An Initial Consultation: 720-759-2795

  • Home
  • About Us
    • Justin M. Plaskov
    • Rachel Tumin
    • Denison Goodrich-Schlenker
    • Dan R. Godin
    • Colleen Kennedy
  • Employment Law
    • Discrimination
    • Age Discrimination
    • Disability Discrimination
    • Pregnancy Discrimination
    • Racial Discrimination
    • Sexual Harassment
    • Equity Agreements
    • Noncompete Agreements
    • Severance Agreements
    • Breach Of Contract
    • Family And Medical Leave Act
    • FAMLI Leave
    • Wage And Hour Law
    • Worker Misclassification
    • Federal Employment Law
    • Protecting Whistleblowers
    • Wrongful Termination
  • Case Results
  • Reviews
  • Blog
  • Contact
Colorado Employee Advocates | CEA

Schedule An Initial Consultation: 720-759-2795

  • Home
  • About Us
    • Justin M. Plaskov
    • Rachel Tumin
    • Denison Goodrich-Schlenker
    • Dan R. Godin
    • Colleen Kennedy
  • Employment Law
    • Discrimination
    • Age Discrimination
    • Disability Discrimination
    • Pregnancy Discrimination
    • Racial Discrimination
    • Sexual Harassment
    • Equity Agreements
    • Noncompete Agreements
    • Severance Agreements
    • Breach Of Contract
    • Family And Medical Leave Act
    • FAMLI Leave
    • Wage And Hour Law
    • Worker Misclassification
    • Federal Employment Law
    • Protecting Whistleblowers
    • Wrongful Termination
  • Case Results
  • Reviews
  • Blog
  • Contact
Colorado Employee Advocates | CEA
  • Home
  • About Us
    • Justin M. Plaskov
    • Rachel Tumin
    • Denison Goodrich-Schlenker
    • Dan R. Godin
    • Colleen Kennedy
  • Employment Law
    • Discrimination
    • Age Discrimination
    • Disability Discrimination
    • Pregnancy Discrimination
    • Racial Discrimination
    • Sexual Harassment
    • Equity Agreements
    • Noncompete Agreements
    • Severance Agreements
    • Breach Of Contract
    • Family And Medical Leave Act
    • FAMLI Leave
    • Wage And Hour Law
    • Worker Misclassification
    • Federal Employment Law
    • Protecting Whistleblowers
    • Wrongful Termination
  • Case Results
  • Reviews
  • Blog
  • Contact
EMAIL

Call

Dedicated To Supporting Colorado Workers

  1. Home
  2.  – 
  3. Discrimination
  4.  – 
  5. Supreme Court opens door to claims about work transfers

Supreme Court opens door to claims about work transfers

On Behalf of Colorado Employee Advocates | Aug 30, 2024 | Discrimination

Workplace discrimination comes in many forms and Colorado employees who believe they have been victimized need to be aware of when they could have cause for a legal claim.

A recent decision by the U.S. Supreme Court clarified some issues involving discrimination and job-related transfers. The new ruling will allow people to challenge the employer’s decision and assert their rights were violated under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. This provides another layer of protection for workers once they are aware of it and gives them the opening to file a claim if they have been wronged.

How does the SCOTUS decision affect complaints about transfers?

In the past, the only way in which a worker could lodge an employment law complaint about a transfer was if it was perceived to have done them “significant injury.” That has been changed to “some harm.” This distinction is important as it lowers the threshold for which a worker who believes the transfer was based on discrimination can file a legal claim.

The decision stemmed from the case of a police officer in Missouri who said she was transferred because she was a woman and her new commander wanted to install a male in her job. The commander asserted that the work was too dangerous for her as she was a plainclothes officer in intelligence. She said the new job was vastly different to what she did previously as she was supervising neighborhood patrols. The hours and schedule were also different.

Since her role changed, so did the benefits such as FBI status and a work vehicle for her use. Her schedule was also upended. Whereas she worked a conventional Monday to Friday when she was in intelligence, the new job had a rotating schedule. The case had been decided as not having caused her significant harm in lower courts. The Supreme Court viewed it from a different perspective, thereby lowering the standard to determine whether a person was harmed.

If workers are transferred for no reason other than perceptions about their ability based on a factor like gender and that worker is harmed because of it, then this could be cause to file a legal claim based on Title VII.

Workers who believe they were discriminated against should seek information

Discrimination comes in many forms. While Title VII is meant to provide protection, there are times when workers are unhappy with a work action but do not realize that it reached the level of illegal activity on the part of their employer. A transfer can be a matter of inconvenience, put a person in a worse situation, cost them income and cause other problems. If it was done for discriminatory reasons, there could be the basis to file a legal claim. People who think they were discriminated against in any way on the job should know their rights and take the necessary steps to make sure they are treated fairly and the employer is held accountable.

Recent Posts

  • How to spot non-verbal sexual harassment at work
  • Could age and race discrimination be hiding in your performance review?
  • Can a severance agreement block whistleblowing?
  • Can Denver tech workers challenge a non-compete?
  • How to prove age discrimination in the workplace

Archives

Categories

  • Age Discrimination
  • Breach Of Contract
  • Discrimination
  • Family And Medical Leave Act
  • Mediation
  • Noncompete Agreements
  • Nondisclosure Agreements
  • Sexual Harrassment
  • The Power Of Documents
  • Wage & Hour Law
  • When To Distrust Your Employer
  • Whistleblower Protection

RSS Feed

Subscribe To This Blog’s Feed

Schedule Your Initial Consultation Today

Fill out the form below and give us a brief description of your legal issue. Please note that we do charge a fee for the initial consultation.

While this website provides general information, it does not constitute legal advice. The best way to get guidance on your specific legal issue is to contact a lawyer. To schedule a meeting with an attorney, please call the firm or complete the intake form below.

Colorado Employee Advocates is a law firm that litigates plaintiff employment law claims and provides advice to employees. Please feel free to call our office or submit your information via the form below.

If your legal situation is a situation for which we believe we may be able to provide assistance, we will offer you a confidential legal consultation so we can learn about you and your unique situation, provide you with an analysis of your legal claims, give you legal and practical advice, and discuss ways in which we may be able to offer representation.

Colorado Employee Advocates can sometimes offer to take your case on a contingency fee basis, meaning that if we take your case, you owe us nothing unless we are able to recover for you.

However, except in very rare circumstances, we are not able to offer free consultations. Thus, if we offer you a consultation, you will need to pay for the attorney’s time, which can vary based on the attorney you meet with and the amount of time required for your particular situation.

Office Location

1999 Broadway
Suite 3225
Denver, CO 80202

Colorado Employee Advocates | CEA
Denver Employment Law Office

Phone

720-759-2795
  • Follow
Review Us

© 2026 Colorado Employee Advocates • All Rights Reserved

Disclaimer | Site Map | Privacy Policy | Business Development Solutions by FindLaw